Comparison
INMO GO3 vs Xiaomi AI Glasses
| INMO GO3 | Xiaomi AI Glasses | |
|---|---|---|
| Glaiss score | 6.2 | 7.7 |
| Launch price | 599 $ | — |
| Weight | 58 g | 40 g |
| Type | AI with display | Not available in the EU |
| Display | Binocular green micro-LED with diffractive waveguide, 640 × 480, 1500 nits | No display |
| Field of view | 30° | — |
| Camera | Yes, resolution not published. Video up to 60 seconds | 12 MP, 2K video at 30 fps |
| Battery | — | 8.6 h |
| AI | INMO’s own assistant | Super Xiao AI (Chinese only) |
| Translation | 98 languages online and 9 offline, Spanish among the nine | Real-time translation, built around Chinese |
| English | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer | Assistant does not work properly in English |
| Seller warranty | 1 year | — |
Which should you buy?
What decides this is not the score, it is the display. INMO GO3 shows information on the lens, while Xiaomi AI Glasses shows nothing and answers through the speakers. Reading is far faster than listening, but you pay for it in battery, price and discretion.
Xiaomi AI Glasses wins the overall score by 1.5 points, but that score averages six criteria and you will only use some of them.
Only INMO GO3 has manufacturer-confirmed support for your language. That changes daily use more than any spec, and most comparison sites skip it.
Xiaomi AI Glasses is 18 grams lighter, which you feel on your nose after eight hours.