RayNeo iO vs Xiaomi AI Glasses
| RayNeo iO | Xiaomi AI Glasses | |
|---|---|---|
| Glaiss score | 8.7 | 7.7 |
| Launch price | 479 $ | — |
| Weight | 33 g | 40 g |
| Type | AI with display | Not available in the EU |
| Display | Monochrome green waveguide, 1,300 nits, 97% transparency | No display |
| Field of view | 23.5° | — |
| Camera | No camera | 12 MP, 2K video at 30 fps |
| Battery | 48 h | 8.6 h |
| AI | RayNeo AI + Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (optional $9.99/month tier for ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek) | Super Xiao AI (Chinese only) |
| Translation | 55 languages, 109 accents (Timekettle BabelOS 3.0) | Real-time translation, built around Chinese |
| English | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer | Assistant does not work properly in English |
| Seller warranty | 1 year | — |
Which should you buy?
What decides this is not the score, it is the display. RayNeo iO shows information on the lens, while Xiaomi AI Glasses shows nothing and answers through the speakers. Reading is far faster than listening, but you pay for it in battery, price and discretion.
RayNeo iO wins the overall score by 1.0 points, but that score averages six criteria and you will only use some of them.
Battery is not close: RayNeo iO lasts 48 hours against 8.6 h for the Xiaomi AI Glasses. The reason is the camera: recording is what drains the cell.
Xiaomi AI Glasses has a camera and RayNeo iO does not. If you want to capture without reaching for your phone, the comparison ends there.
Only RayNeo iO has manufacturer-confirmed support for your language. That changes daily use more than any spec, and most comparison sites skip it.