Comparison
Halliday G2 vs Meta Ray-Ban Display
| Halliday G2 | Meta Ray-Ban Display | |
|---|---|---|
| Glaiss score | 7.6 | 7.0 |
| Launch price | 599 $ | 799 $ |
| Weight | 49 g | 69 g |
| Type | AI with display | AI with display |
| Display | Binocular microLED waveguide, 600 × 300 per eye, up to 1600 nits | Colour display 600×600, 5,000 nits |
| Field of view | 25° | 20° |
| Camera | No camera | 12 MP |
| Battery | 12 h | 6 h |
| AI | Halliday’s own assistant | Meta AI (Llama 4) |
| Translation | Over 45 languages in the translation feature | — |
| English | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer |
| Seller warranty | 1 year | — |
Which should you buy?
Both belong to the same family, so here the scores are genuinely comparable.
Halliday G2 wins the overall score by 0.6 points, but that score averages six criteria and you will only use some of them.
Battery is not close: Halliday G2 lasts 12 hours against 6 h for the Meta Ray-Ban Display. The reason is the camera: recording is what drains the cell.
Meta Ray-Ban Display has a camera and Halliday G2 does not. If you want to capture without reaching for your phone, the comparison ends there.
Both have manufacturer-confirmed language support.
Halliday G2 is 20 grams lighter, which you feel on your nose after eight hours.
On price, Halliday G2 is $200 cheaper.