Comparison
Even Realities G2 vs Quark AI Glasses S1
| Even Realities G2 | Quark AI Glasses S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Glaiss score | 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Launch price | 599 $ | — |
| Weight | 36 g | — |
| Type | AI with display | Not available in the EU |
| Display | Monochrome green waveguide, 640×350 | Binocular dual micro-OLED |
| Field of view | 27.5° | — |
| Camera | No camera | 3K video, AI-enhanced 4K output, 0.6 s capture |
| Battery | 48 h | 24 h |
| AI | Even AI | Qwen (Alibaba), "Hello Qwen" |
| Translation | ~35 languages, Spanish confirmed | On-the-go translation; languages not detailed by the manufacturer |
| English | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer | Assistant does not work properly in English |
| Seller warranty | 2 years | — |
Which should you buy?
Both belong to the same family, so here the scores are genuinely comparable.
Even Realities G2 wins the overall score by 0.5 points, but that score averages six criteria and you will only use some of them.
Battery is not close: Even Realities G2 lasts 48 hours against 24 h for the Quark AI Glasses S1. The reason is the camera: recording is what drains the cell.
Quark AI Glasses S1 has a camera and Even Realities G2 does not. If you want to capture without reaching for your phone, the comparison ends there.
Only Even Realities G2 has manufacturer-confirmed support for your language. That changes daily use more than any spec, and most comparison sites skip it.