Comparison
INMO GO3 vs Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2
| INMO GO3 | Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Glaiss score | 6.2 | 7.9 |
| Launch price | 599 $ | 379 $ |
| Weight | 58 g | 50 g |
| Type | AI with display | AI, no display |
| Display | Binocular green micro-LED with diffractive waveguide, 640 × 480, 1500 nits | No display |
| Field of view | 30° | — |
| Camera | Yes, resolution not published. Video up to 60 seconds | 12 MP ultrawide, 3K video |
| Battery | — | 8 h |
| AI | INMO’s own assistant | Meta AI (Llama 4) |
| Translation | 98 languages online and 9 offline, Spanish among the nine | — |
| English | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer |
| Seller warranty | 1 year | 3 years |
Which should you buy?
What decides this is not the score, it is the display. INMO GO3 shows information on the lens, while Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 shows nothing and answers through the speakers. Reading is far faster than listening, but you pay for it in battery, price and discretion.
Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 wins the overall score by 1.7 points, but that score averages six criteria and you will only use some of them.
Both have manufacturer-confirmed language support.
On price, Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 is $220 cheaper.
Watch the warranty: INMO GO3 offers 1 year and Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 offers 3 years.