Comparison
Halliday G2 vs INMO GO3
Halliday G2Higher score
8.4out of 10
Official price: 599 $ (US price; no European price published)
Read the full review| Halliday G2 | INMO GO3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Glaiss score | 8.4 | 7.6 |
| Launch price | 599 $ | 599 $ |
| Weight | 49 g | 58 g |
| Type | AI with display | Everything in your glasses |
| Display | Binocular microLED waveguide, 600 × 300 per eye, up to 1600 nits | Binocular green micro-LED with diffractive waveguide, 640 × 480, 1500 nits |
| Field of view | 25° | 30° |
| Camera | No camera | Yes, resolution not published. Video up to 60 seconds |
| Battery | 12 h | — |
| AI | Halliday’s own assistant | INMO’s own assistant |
| Translation | Over 45 languages in the translation feature | 98 languages online and 9 offline, Spanish among the nine |
| English | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer |
| Seller warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Which should you buy?
Both belong to the same family, so here the scores are genuinely comparable.
Halliday G2 wins the overall score by 0.8 points, but that score averages six criteria and you will only use some of them.
INMO GO3 has a camera and Halliday G2 does not. If you want to capture without reaching for your phone, the comparison ends there.
Both have manufacturer-confirmed language support.
They cost essentially the same.
Halliday G2Higher score
8.4out of 10
Official price: 599 $ (US price; no European price published)
Read the full review