Comparison
Even Realities G2 vs Meta Glasses
| Even Realities G2 | Meta Glasses | |
|---|---|---|
| Glaiss score | 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Launch price | 599 $ | — |
| Weight | 36 g | — |
| Type | AI with display | AI, no display |
| Display | Monochrome green waveguide, 640×350 | No display |
| Field of view | 27.5° | — |
| Camera | No camera | 12 MP ultrawide, video up to 3K |
| Battery | 48 h | 8 h |
| AI | Even AI | Meta AI |
| Translation | ~35 languages, Spanish confirmed | — |
| English | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer | Assistant speaks English · confirmed by the manufacturer |
| Seller warranty | 2 years | 2 years |
Which should you buy?
What decides this is not the score, it is the display. Even Realities G2 shows information on the lens, while Meta Glasses shows nothing and answers through the speakers. Reading is far faster than listening, but you pay for it in battery, price and discretion.
Even Realities G2 wins the overall score by 0.2 points, but that score averages six criteria and you will only use some of them.
Battery is not close: Even Realities G2 lasts 48 hours against 8 h for the Meta Glasses. The reason is the camera: recording is what drains the cell.
Meta Glasses has a camera and Even Realities G2 does not. If you want to capture without reaching for your phone, the comparison ends there.
Both have manufacturer-confirmed language support.